1. BMP-2 really crap, compared to it's USA counterpart - the M2A1 "Bradley. Ability to be amphibious and better autocannon can't help with that. May be better to increase range of BMPs ATGM to AT-5s standart? Also, increase the damage of Konkurs to 80% of TOWs.
2. T-80BV, which is equal to M1A1 "Abrams", or even less worse. On the first look, all is ok. But the main problem in rank: you can get your Ambars at rank 2, when T-80 BV is required rank 3. Just make the T-80BV aviable at rank 2.
Registration Date: May 2009
Location: Bucuresti
Posts: 114
You can change such things yourself, it's just editing some text that is self-explained...
All of these balance issues have been discussed over and over again and a lot of people came up with a lot of suggestions, also taking account of gameplay, balance, realism effect, etc, etc this is the final result...
If you would have more fun with other settings, look up .big editor, FinalBig or something, and just modify what you want, all weapon settings are contained in a text file... Have fun!
09.03.2011, 02:36
Su-47
Elite Member
Registration Date: April 2010
Location: OKB Suchoi
Posts: 145
So it is quite good...
I wish everyone a wonderful good day !
As the previous speaker said, it is the optimum (in terms of BMP-2 vs. M2A1) as it is now.
Moreover, this is not entirely unrealistic. Finally, on the side of the USSR it was always done "relatively little" for the crew. It had always set to "mass ". As a result, the "vehicles" on the U.S. getting better armor, so were larger. The armament of the "vehicle " is then another subject in itself.
08.03.2011, 22:10
So it is quite good...
!