| Author |
|
maximka123
1337 haXX0r Warnings: 2
  
Registration Date: June 2005
Location: Russia, Rostov-on-Don
Posts: 431 |
|
|
Hey, i`m host this topic in reason Tow missle more stronger than At-5!
I`m play with livin, and my abrams was destroyed by two shot from 2 tow missles, before this happend i was sure that abrams can`t be destroyed by 2 normal toy shots and didn`t care to used smoke granedes. For AT-5 need 3-4 shoots to destroyed abrams! i`m think this is not rigth, i`m think that AT-5 and humvee with Tow should be equal. or increase cost of Hummer with Tow to diasble players build a lot of tow vehicles.
So my suggestion is decrease(do less) firepower of tow missles from humvees.
__________________ Life is still always be like a teacher, it always teach u and do u more and more stronger for difficulties .....so when u broken ich difficulties u may to "drinklife" & take pleasure of life
......thinking about it
Post last edited by maximka123 on 06.06.2009, 12:59.
|
|
05.06.2009, 23:49 |
|
Chrinik
Heroic Member
 

Registration Date: August 2008
Location:
Posts: 245 |
|
|
Well, a TOW is bigger, has therefore a larger Warhead and a larger Warhead does more damage right?
I hope you follow me there. This Game (i dont tend to use the term Mod) aims for some level of Realism, so when a TOW with its 5.9kg Warhead does more damage then a AT-5 with a 3kg warhead then its all good...
Right?
__________________ I was definately gone for too long...
Never the less, CWC advanced, which is always a plus  Happy Birthday, CWC!
"Everyone who posts a Replay without the accompaning Versionnumber is stupid and should be bolted to a TOW and shot at the nearest T-72!" - Chrinik
|
|
06.06.2009, 06:22 |
|
N00bha
CWC Beta Tester Warnings: 1
  

Registration Date: July 2007
Location:
Posts: 355 |
|
|
Sorry, but.. LOL!
Hey, listen up - Chrinik said it already:
5.9kg Warhead does nearly double the damage of 3kg warhead of the AT-5.
So, it is that way - and it never meant to be same.
Because USSR is meant to be heavier tanks, so USA needs better Anti Tank.
__________________

Zitat: Star Wars Episode III "So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause."
|
|
06.06.2009, 12:21 |
|
maximka123
1337 haXX0r Warnings: 2
  
Registration Date: June 2005
Location: Russia, Rostov-on-Don
Posts: 431 |
|
|
Zitat: Originally posted by N00bha
Sorry, but.. LOL!
Hey, listen up - Chrinik said it already:
5.9kg Warhead does nearly double the damage of 3kg warhead of the AT-5.
So, it is that way - and it never meant to be same.
Because USSR is meant to be heavier tanks, so USA needs better Anti Tank.
may be, but, listen me, abrams moe better than even T-80uk : +10% of armor + 120mm more powerfull than 125mm, so i`m don`t understood what u talking about word heavier tanks
So i`m think and make suggestion: if tow missles still be better than at-5, we need that M1A1 "Abrams" should be less in all points than T-80UK, and M1A1 should be equal in all points with T-80BV
__________________ Life is still always be like a teacher, it always teach u and do u more and more stronger for difficulties .....so when u broken ich difficulties u may to "drinklife" & take pleasure of life
......thinking about it
Post last edited by maximka123 on 06.06.2009, 12:57.
|
|
06.06.2009, 12:27 |
|
raptor6
1337 haXX0r Warnings: 1
  
Registration Date: December 2008
Location:
Posts: 418 |
|
|
Have to agree with Noobha and Chrinik.
About tanks: I think it is already known that in 482 version it will be balanced again since most players agreed with that.
|
|
06.06.2009, 13:31 |
|
maximka123
1337 haXX0r Warnings: 2
  
Registration Date: June 2005
Location: Russia, Rostov-on-Don
Posts: 431 |
|
|
Zitat: Originally posted by raptor6
Have to agree with Noobha and Chrinik.
About tanks: I think it is already known that in 482 version it will be balanced again since most players agreed with that.
Yeh i`m known Raptor Just tell this again in case to don`t forgot about this suggestions 
__________________ Life is still always be like a teacher, it always teach u and do u more and more stronger for difficulties .....so when u broken ich difficulties u may to "drinklife" & take pleasure of life
......thinking about it
|
|
06.06.2009, 13:45 |
|
HaryPL
CWC Beta Tester
  

Registration Date: March 2008
Location: Poland
Posts: 1365 |
|
|
Situation with TOW and AT5 will change in next patch without any direct changes.
So till 482 will be released, with these tank changes, we should stop any discussions about ATGM vs Tanks etc.
__________________ - Never argue with an Idiot- He would lead you to his level ,and then, beat with experience -
- Bravery doesn't meant that You are not afraid. It means that You go there anyway -
Sry for my bad grammar
|
|
06.06.2009, 18:07 |
|
WaSteD
Banned: 1x 1337 haXX0r
  

Registration Date: May 2005
Location: Romania - Bucharest
Posts: 311 |
|
|
Zitat: Originally posted by raptor6
Have to agree with Noobha and Chrinik.
About tanks: I think it is already known that in 482 version it will be balanced again since most players agreed with that.
What exactly would those changes be?
__________________ " Invincibility lies in the defence; the possibility of victory, in the attack! "
Sun Tzu - The Art of War
|
|
11.06.2009, 20:22 |
|
HaryPL
CWC Beta Tester
  

Registration Date: March 2008
Location: Poland
Posts: 1365 |
|
|
Abrams armor will be reduced to previous stat, or previous +5%.
Only guessing tho, only team knew the truth 
__________________ - Never argue with an Idiot- He would lead you to his level ,and then, beat with experience -
- Bravery doesn't meant that You are not afraid. It means that You go there anyway -
Sry for my bad grammar
|
|
11.06.2009, 21:20 |
|
maximka123
1337 haXX0r Warnings: 2
  
Registration Date: June 2005
Location: Russia, Rostov-on-Don
Posts: 431 |
|
|
Zitat: Originally posted by HaryPL
Abrams armor will be reduced to previous stat, or previous +5%.
Only guessing tho, only team knew the truth
yeh, but may be u known some more? How about firepower of Abrams? This will be also reduced to be equal T-80BV?
BWT waiting v482 to see what changes it will have 
__________________ Life is still always be like a teacher, it always teach u and do u more and more stronger for difficulties .....so when u broken ich difficulties u may to "drinklife" & take pleasure of life
......thinking about it
Post last edited by maximka123 on 12.06.2009, 02:26.
|
|
12.06.2009, 02:25 |
|
HaryPL
CWC Beta Tester
  

Registration Date: March 2008
Location: Poland
Posts: 1365 |
|
|
Ask team, not me. I'm not one of 'them'
About firepower: even if not totally real-life and not liked by u, i think that M1 main gun should be the 2nd strongest in CWC [ minimum advantage for T80UK or even better - equal stats for both guns].
__________________ - Never argue with an Idiot- He would lead you to his level ,and then, beat with experience -
- Bravery doesn't meant that You are not afraid. It means that You go there anyway -
Sry for my bad grammar
|
|
12.06.2009, 16:09 |
|
RPG777
Member
  
Registration Date: January 2009
Location:
Posts: 44 |
|
|
I think TOW due to its 2 times heavier warhead should be definately causing about 2 times more damage as it is now. So no need for changes.
|
|
24.06.2009, 08:56 |
|
Macheta
Member
  

Registration Date: August 2008
Location: Russia, Rostov-on-Don
Posts: 46 |
|
|
Zitat: Originally posted by RPG777
I think TOW due to its 2 times heavier warhead should be definately causing about 2 times more damage as it is now. So no need for changes.
Was I rightly understanding? Heavier warhead = more damage?
If such is the case that it's rightly not completely. Heavier warhead is a part of effectiveness of missile. Besides it's still type of warhead and principle of operation.
|
|
24.06.2009, 09:07 |
|
raptor6
1337 haXX0r Warnings: 1
  
Registration Date: December 2008
Location:
Posts: 418 |
|
|
Real situation is:
AT-5 sparandel
Introduced: 1977
Name: AT-5/SPANDREL
Warhead Type: Shaped Charge (HEAT)
Armor Penetration at 0 degree (mm) 650
Minimum/Maximum Range (m) 75/4,000
Probability of Hit (%) 90
AT-5 Sparandel (at the end of the table)
TOW: There is not given in game precise info of what TOW is used. But since TOW hummer is given for free of GP at the very beginning I can suggest TOW is "BGM-71C Improved TOW wich was delivered in 1982 (appeared in 1978 according to wiki) featuring an extended probe for greater armor penetration and an improved motor enhancing the range up to 3750 meters.
TOW
Name: BGM-71C Improved TOW
Warhead Type: 3.9 kg (2.63 kg HE) HEAT
Armor Penetration at 0 degree (mm) 800
Minimum/Maximum Range (m) 65/3750
Probability of Hit (%) INA
Previous types - XBGM-71A/BGM-71A, BGM-71B had 600 mm armor penetration.
After BGM-71C:
TOW 2 (900 mm) in 1983, TOW 2A/B(1000 mm, 1000 mm <) in 1987. How I already told since TOW hummer is free of GP and already available at first level - it is logic to 'give' him BGM-71C (800 mm).
Literature:
TOW_1
TOW_2
TOW_3
_________________________________
So now I think that AT-5 (650 mm) damage should be definetely increased till 81 % of hummer TOW damage (800 mm). At-5 two times smaller damage is too far from realism (because TOW with 1200 mm penetration and more were introduced after 1989). Also AT-5 should have a bit bigger max range than TOW and a bit increased min range then TOW. Also hit probability can be icreased till 90 %.
|
|
04.07.2009, 08:20 |
|
|